From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Mon Nov 26 09:42:08 2001
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 26 Nov 2001 17:42:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 36572 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2001 17:42:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172)
  by m12.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Nov 2001 17:42:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2001 17:42:09 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:17:53 +0000
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:55:40 +0000
Message-Id: <sc02821c.083@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:55:01 +0000
To: jcowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Cc: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] stress, capitalization & audiovisual isomorphism
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

>>> John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> 11/26/01 05:23pm >>>
#And Rosta wrote:
#> My preferred scheme for getting rid of apostrophes is to replace i and u
#> in diphthongs by y and w and then delete all apostrophes. The resulting =
orthography is, I think, unambiguous, but it makes the signification of
#> <y> subject to more complex rules than the other letters. That extra
#> complexity had been called by Lojbab a deviation from AVI.
#
#Indeed, it would be: specifically, it would cease to be an isomorphism,
#since <y> would sometimes mean [@] and sometimes [j].

but <y>-adjacent-to-V would always mean [@] and <y>-not-adjacent
to-V would always mean [j]. And vice versa from sound to spelling.
So why is this less of an isomorphism than <V>-in-penult-syllable
=3D stressed-[V] and <V>-not-in-penult =3D unstressed-[V]?

#you are free to retort that already <i> means sometimes /i/ and
#sometimes /j/, but I will riposte that there is no /j/ in
#Lojban.

My retorts are never so bereft of wisdom as that would be...

--And.


