From pycyn@aol.com Mon Nov 26 14:09:23 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 26 Nov 2001 22:09:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 16135 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2001 22:09:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167)
  by m6.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Nov 2001 22:09:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m08.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.163)
  by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2001 22:09:23 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-m08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id r.81.13aa674e (4533)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:09:15 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <81.13aa674e.2934178b@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:09:15 EST
Subject: Re: [lojban] lo'e and NAhEBO
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_81.13aa674e.2934178b_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra

--part1_81.13aa674e.2934178b_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 11/26/2001 10:45:00 AM Central Standard Time, 
jcowan@reutershealth.com writes:


> Well, I think this presupposition is just wrong: the typical American is
> not the modal American -- on what scale, anyway? Height? Income?
> Color of car? Rather, lo'e merkypre is an *abstract entity* that
> abstracts away everything which is not typical: thus he/she has a car,
> but is neither male nor female.
> 

Think "the average man" (though not necessarily the statistical part). 
{lo'e/le'e} is slightly misleading in that it looks like it is about (an) 
individual(s) specifically, whereas it is about a class vaguely. The goal 
involved might be better served -- in a logical language -- by an adverb, a 
modal cmavo, of some sort: "member of the class broda *typically* brode," 
but, following English, Loglan and Lojban have gone another way, with the 
occasional ontological problems that result.

--part1_81.13aa674e.2934178b_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 11/26/2001 10:45:00 AM Central Standard Time, jcowan@reutershealth.com writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Well, I think this presupposition is just wrong: the typical American is
<BR>not the modal American -- on what scale, anyway? &nbsp;Height? &nbsp;Income?
<BR>Color of car? &nbsp;Rather, lo'e merkypre is an *abstract entity* that
<BR>abstracts away everything which is not typical: thus he/she has a car,
<BR>but is neither male nor female.
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>Think "the average man" (though not necessarily the statistical part). &nbsp;{lo'e/le'e} is slightly misleading in that it looks like it is about (an) individual(s) specifically, whereas it is about a class vaguely. &nbsp;The goal involved might be better served -- in a logical language -- by an adverb, a modal cmavo, of some sort: "member of the class broda *typically* brode," &nbsp;but, following English, Loglan and Lojban have gone another way, with the occasional ontological problems that result.</FONT></HTML>

--part1_81.13aa674e.2934178b_boundary--

