From pycyn@aol.com Tue Nov 27 06:50:23 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 27 Nov 2001 14:50:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 92999 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2001 14:50:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 Nov 2001 14:50:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m06.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.161) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 2001 14:50:20 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id r.b0.1dec45fe (4069) for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 09:50:10 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 09:50:09 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] Why I'm still posting... To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_b0.1dec45fe.29350221_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_b0.1dec45fe.29350221_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/27/2001 6:41:44 AM Central Standard Time, thinkit8@lycos.com writes: > Because I'm interested in conlangs in general, and the lojban grammar > in particular. And Rosta...aren't you the same in that way? Whether > I want to use the words is irrelevant. And that's why I wanted to > continue to use the wiki. > Well, And can answer for himself, but he has, despite his frequent misrepresentations and odd positions, always shown that he knows what Lojban is and that he is engaging in legitmate Lojbanic activities (though sometime peripheral to the main point). I am less sure about thinkit's bona fides, but i would not keep him out for all that (though magically giving him the gift of a tactful withdrawal when he has driven a point into the ground would help). And the symbol system is interesting albeit necessarily limited (not "orthography" though, since that is about spelling, not the look of the letters -- calligraphy? glyphomorphy?). --part1_b0.1dec45fe.29350221_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/27/2001 6:41:44 AM Central Standard Time, thinkit8@lycos.com writes:



Because I'm interested in conlangs in general, and the lojban grammar
in particular.  And Rosta...aren't you the same in that way?  Whether
I want to use the words is irrelevant.  And that's why I wanted to
continue to use the wiki.




Well, And can answer for himself, but he has, despite his frequent misrepresentations and odd positions, always shown that he knows what Lojban is and that he is engaging in legitmate Lojbanic activities (though sometime peripheral to the main point). I am less sure about thinkit's bona fides, but i would not keep him out for all that (though magically giving him the gift of a tactful withdrawal when he has driven a point into the ground would help).
And the symbol system is interesting albeit necessarily limited (not "orthography" though, since that is about spelling, not the look of the letters -- calligraphy? glyphomorphy?). --part1_b0.1dec45fe.29350221_boundary--