From jjllambias@hotmail.com Wed Nov 28 15:39:15 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 28 Nov 2001 23:39:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 75372 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2001 23:39:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m4.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Nov 2001 23:39:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.32) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2001 23:39:14 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 15:39:14 -0800 Received: from 200.69.11.131 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:39:14 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.131] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] ro falkone be roda Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:39:14 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Nov 2001 23:39:14.0747 (UTC) FILETIME=[E38838B0:01C17865] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la pier cusku di'e >{ro falkone be roda}. As there is more >than one kind of falcon, and no falcon belongs to all kinds at once, this >phrase has no referent. What is the correct way to say this? ro da poi su'o de zo'u ke'a falkone de Which should be the same as {ro falkone be da}, or just {ro falkone}. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp