From BestATN@aol.com Fri Nov 30 05:24:52 2001
Return-Path: <BestATN@aol.com>
X-Sender: BestATN@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 30 Nov 2001 13:24:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 59771 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2001 13:24:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172)
  by m8.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Nov 2001 13:24:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r01.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.97)
  by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Nov 2001 13:24:51 -0000
Received: from BestATN@aol.com
  by imo-r01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id r.13f.55bc95e (3926)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 08:24:42 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <13f.55bc95e.2938e29a@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 08:24:42 EST
Subject: pro fuzzy logic
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_13f.55bc95e.2938e29a_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10536
From: BestATN@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbaner

--part1_13f.55bc95e.2938e29a_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

i regard fuzzy logic as a sort of superset of ordinary two-valued (or 
n-valued) logic. thus i think it is imperative that lojban be able to handle 
fuzzy logic easily and naturally. however, i have not yet looked at how this 
is (or could be) done in lojban. the refgram says only that 'The detailed 
conventions for using "jei" in fuzzy-logic contexts have not yet been 
established.' i don't use fuzzy logic much, so this issue hasn't been a high 
priority for me.
steven lytle

--part1_13f.55bc95e.2938e29a_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2 FAMILY="SCRIPT" FACE="Comic Sans MS" LANG="0">i regard fuzzy logic as a sort of superset of ordinary two-valued (or n-valued) logic. &nbsp;thus i think it is imperative that lojban be able to handle fuzzy logic easily and naturally. &nbsp;however, i have not yet looked at how this is (or could be) done in lojban. &nbsp;the refgram says only that 'The detailed conventions for using "jei" in fuzzy-logic contexts have not yet been established.' &nbsp;i don't use fuzzy logic much, so this issue hasn't been a high priority for me.
<BR>steven lytle</FONT></HTML>

--part1_13f.55bc95e.2938e29a_boundary--

