Subject: The bigness of a set

From: Invent Yourself <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:51:35 -0500 (EST)

Sets have certain properties, like cardinality, membership, and inclusion.
Physical size is not one of them. Therefore how do we deal with a
statement like the canonical "lo'i ratcu cu barda"? It appears that, in
context, a reference to a set is being replaced by a reference to the
cardinality of the set.

-- 
The tao that can be tar(1)ed
is not the entire Tao.
The path that can be specified
is not the Full Path.