From xod@sixgirls.org Fri Nov 30 21:39:56 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 1 Dec 2001 05:39:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 67656 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2001 05:39:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Dec 2001 05:39:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (216.27.131.50) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Dec 2001 05:39:56 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB15dtD12003 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 00:39:55 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 00:39:54 -0500 (EST) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20011201003119.04f31100@pop.cais.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple Typically "lo'i ratcu" means {the set of rats}. In this case it means {the cardinality of the set of rats}. -- The tao that can be tar(1)ed is not the entire Tao. The path that can be specified is not the Full Path.