From thinkit8@lycos.com Mon Dec 03 09:23:43 2001
Return-Path: <thinkit8@lycos.com>
X-Sender: thinkit8@lycos.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 3 Dec 2001 17:23:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 80275 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2001 17:23:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Dec 2001 17:23:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n22.groups.yahoo.com) (216.115.96.72)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2001 17:23:43 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: thinkit8@lycos.com
Received: from [10.1.4.82] by n22.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Dec 2001 17:23:42 -0000
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 17:23:39 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: thoughts on numerical language
Message-ID: <9ugcer+goq9@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 959
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 12.224.27.33
From: thinkit8@lycos.com
X-Yahoo-Profile: thinkit41

When trying to put together a binary-encoded language, I noticed 
some interesting things. Lojban serves as a great model, for one. 
I noticed some things became a lot easier--you don't have to worry 
about fitting things into human pronunciation. Depending on how 
compact you want it to be, there's a lot less compromises to be 
made. This becomes even more freeing (perhaps this is an extention 
of the hypothesis...maybe our vocal cords limit our thought).

In particular, it became clear that various parts of lojban are 
shaped by things like the number of vowels. Like the so'a-so'u 
series. This is really just a base-6 system of representing an 
approximate scale. I would encode this as .X, given in a specified 
base. Also, the fa-fu system and limit of 5 arguments for a given 
gismu. This is a useful shortcut given the 5-vowel system. Not 
having to be short and tidy, I found it easier to assume a 2 
argument system with extra tags.


