From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Thu Dec 06 10:49:36 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_2); 6 Dec 2001 18:49:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 52870 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2001 18:48:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Dec 2001 18:48:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2001 18:48:07 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16C3Z7-0000Zb-00 for ; Thu, 06 Dec 2001 10:48:13 -0800 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:48:13 -0800 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] [WWW] browser usage statistics (was: Big update!) Message-ID: <20011206184813.GV6855@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i From: Robin Lee Powell X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=66827819 X-Yahoo-Profile: robinleepowell On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 11:57:51PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Jay Kominek wrote: > > BrowserWatch pegs Internet Explorer with 86.8% of users, Netscape > > (all versions combined) with 6.77%, Opera and lynx with 2.2% and > > 1.1% respectively. That agrees with Google's Zeitgeist data. > > I don't expect anyone to reconsider any page rendering issues just for > me, but as crashy as NS 4.7 Linux is (and it is!), it renders pages > faster and better than Opera (version as of 3 weeks ago) or Mozilla > (that shipped with Mandrake 8.0) or Konqueror. And I'm trying *very* hard to accomodate you. See http://www.digitalkingdom.org/lojban_broken.html for an example of the shit that Netscape pulls. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/