From phm@A2E.DE Thu Dec 06 14:50:47 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: phm@a2e.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_2); 6 Dec 2001 22:50:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 42768 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2001 22:50:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m10.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Dec 2001 22:50:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bartu.bos.a2e.de) (62.154.243.66) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2001 22:50:46 -0000 Received: from mulix.oas.a2e.de (mulix.oas.a2e.de [10.0.0.122]) by bartu.bos.a2e.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id XAA12072; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 23:58:02 +0100 Received: from localhost (phm@localhost) by mulix.oas.a2e.de (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id fB6JwVX07519; Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:58:32 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: mulix.oas.a2e.de: phm owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:58:31 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: To: "Robert J. Chassell" Cc: , , , Subject: Re: [lojban] eurolinux proposing lojban for community patent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: PILCH Hartmut X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810613 > The concerned statement > > http://www.eurolinux.org/news/cpat01B/ > > is imho as general as a any statement against software patents. It is now also open for personal signatures and comments in a primitive online guestbook. Maybe for LLG as an organisation the best thing to do would be to publish a web page that discusses the potential of Lojban for the proposed role as an intermediary language for machine-translation and disambiguation. We could then link to that page instead of www.lojban.org. -- Hartmut Pilch http://phm.ffii.org/ Protecting Innovation against Patent Inflation http://swpat.ffii.org/ 95000 signatures against software patents http://www.noepatents.org/