From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Fri Dec 07 14:22:58 2001
Return-Path: <rosta.work2home@ntlworld.com>
X-Sender: rosta.work2home@ntlworld.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_2); 7 Dec 2001 22:22:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 45745 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2001 22:22:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167)
  by m10.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Dec 2001 22:22:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta06-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.46)
  by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2001 22:22:58 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.255.42.227]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com
  (InterMail vM.4.01.03.23 201-229-121-123-20010418) with SMTP
  id <20011207222256.OZLN3849.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew>
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 22:22:56 +0000
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: thoughts on numerical language
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 22:22:12 -0000
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMAEPJFBAA.rosta.work2home@ntlworld.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
In-Reply-To: <E16BNIB-0000Ai-00@mercury.ccil.org>
X-eGroups-From: "And Rosta (Work2Home)" <rosta.work2home@ntlworld.com>
From: "And Rosta (Work2Home)" <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
Reply-To: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810630
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

John:
> And Rosta scripsit:
> 
> > There was once a Loglan reform project
> > called Voksigid whose guiding idea (which then gives you an idea of
> > the calibre of the project)
> 
> Is this praise, condemnation, or a mere neutral remark where "calibre" =
> flavor?

A negative appraisal that I attempted to couch in neutral terms.

> > was to dispense with sumti marked by
> > word order and FA tags and to use only BAI tags.
> 
> A particularly nice feature was that sumti were expressed by root-tag
> compounds, so that the selfsame tags had two uses: as tags, they indicated
> the case (loosely stated) of the sumti in its bridi; as suffixes, they
> indicated the derivation of the sumti from an underlying selbri root.
> 
> I particularly cherish the word "homotor", which combine the root
> "homo" (prenu) with the suffix "-tor", agency. "The agent in the
> event of someone's being a person". Just who is that?

Can you give more examples?

--And.

