From xod@sixgirls.org Thu Dec 13 11:29:44 2001
Return-Path: <xod@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_2); 13 Dec 2001 19:28:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 32832 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2001 17:41:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172)
  by m4.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Dec 2001 17:41:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (216.27.131.50)
  by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2001 17:41:21 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
  by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBDHfKw25572
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 12:41:20 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 12:41:19 -0500 (EST)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: Software Translation of Lojban (was: Re: [lojban] eurolinux
  proposing lojban for community patent
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112131337550.3472-100000@mulix.oas.a2e.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0112131239310.24971-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1138703
X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple

On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, PILCH Hartmut wrote:

> The
>
> eurolinux proposition for the community patent
> http://www.eurolinux.org/news/cpat01B/
>
> has gained some momentum but has yet to reach its peak of exposure.
> One such opportunity may be the announcement of a eu swpat directive
> proposal or of progress on the community patent, both expected soon.
>
> These opportunities could give the Lojban project a boost, if it had a
> paper ready to backup some of the claims of what can be done with an
> intermediate language.
>
> As said, I can say these things only in an abstract form, with no
> specific lojban examples. So any work left to do must be done by
> LLG or I don't know who.



It's possible that the Lojban community doesn't have anybody around at
this time with the technical ability for such a paper. I could be
misunderstanding the depth of the undertaking.



-- 
The tao that can be tar(1)ed
is not the entire Tao.
The path that can be specified
is not the Full Path.


