From xod@sixgirls.org Thu Dec 13 13:38:28 2001
Return-Path: <xod@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_2); 13 Dec 2001 21:38:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 38223 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2001 21:38:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167)
  by m3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Dec 2001 21:38:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (216.27.131.50)
  by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2001 21:38:27 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
  by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBDLcQw00323
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:38:26 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 16:38:25 -0500 (EST)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Software Translation of Lojban
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.40.0112131421550.13631-100000@ucsub.colorado.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0112131636590.24971-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1138703
X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple

On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Jay Kominek wrote:

>
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Invent Yourself wrote:
>
> > > These opportunities could give the Lojban project a boost, if it had a
> > > paper ready to backup some of the claims of what can be done with an
> > > intermediate language.
> > >
> > > As said, I can say these things only in an abstract form, with no
> > > specific lojban examples. So any work left to do must be done by
> > > LLG or I don't know who.
> >
> > It's possible that the Lojban community doesn't have anybody around at
> > this time with the technical ability for such a paper. I could be
> > misunderstanding the depth of the undertaking.
>
> While I've been following this thread intently, I'm not sure what kind of
> paper is desired. I'm vaguely familiar with machine translation, and have
> been considering the problem of Lojban->English for awhile. I've got some
> fairly educated guesses as to what would be involved in what (I think) you
> want. Does that count for anything? :)



My view, possibly pessimistic, is that nobody will (or should) take us
seriously until we have code that runs.



-- 
The tao that can be tar(1)ed
is not the entire Tao.
The path that can be specified
is not the Full Path.


