From rob@twcny.rr.com Mon Dec 17 21:16:02 2001
Return-Path: <rob@twcny.rr.com>
X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 18 Dec 2001 05:16:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 28840 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2001 05:16:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172)
  by m12.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Dec 2001 05:16:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailout6.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.177)
  by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2001 05:16:00 -0000
Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-1 [24.92.226.139])
  by mailout6.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id fBI5Fx828499
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 00:15:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com
  (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
  ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 00:15:58 -0500
Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
  id 16GCaT-0000A5-00
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 00:14:45 -0500
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 00:14:45 -0500
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Logical translation request
Message-ID: <20011218051445.GB552@twcny.rr.com>
References: <F68mgMNCoVul8uuwkLo0000443a@hotmail.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20011217201146.00c278d0@pop.cais.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20011217224458.00c27aa0@pop.cais.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20011217224458.00c27aa0@pop.cais.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com
From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2572649
X-Yahoo-Profile: squeekybobo

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:45:47PM -0500, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote:
> It can, but as naujeki (or naujoiki)

Is there any particular reason for this? Similarly, for the CAhA selma'o
and the fact that CAhA + NAI is ungrammatical?

I've probably expressed this before, but I think that the separation of
tense selma'o is going to be the first thing to go when the baseline
ends - which would for the most part bring the language more in line
with usage anyway, and with the goal to remove restrictions on thought.

-- 
la rab.spir
noi sarji lo'u ka'enai le'u


