From xod@sixgirls.org Mon Dec 17 21:32:58 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 18 Dec 2001 05:32:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 83523 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2001 05:32:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m8.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Dec 2001 05:32:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (216.27.131.50) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2001 05:32:56 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBI5Wtd10318 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 00:32:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 00:32:54 -0500 (EST) To: Subject: sticky nau (was: Re: [lojban] Logical translation request In-Reply-To: <20011218051445.GB552@twcny.rr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1138703 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Rob Speer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:45:47PM -0500, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote: > > It can, but as naujeki (or naujoiki) > > Is there any particular reason for this? Similarly, for the CAhA selma'o > and the fact that CAhA + NAI is ungrammatical? > > I've probably expressed this before, but I think that the separation of > tense selma'o is going to be the first thing to go when the baseline > ends - which would for the most part bring the language more in line > with usage anyway, and with the goal to remove restrictions on thought. Well why would anybody want to stick nau? It's already the default! -- The tao that can be tar(1)ed is not the entire Tao. The path that can be specified is not the Full Path.