Subject: Re: [lojban] Logical translation request

From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 23:08:11 -0500

At 06:49 PM 12/18/01 -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
>On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote:
> > At 12:14 AM 12/18/01 -0500, Rob Speer wrote:
> >
> > >Is there any particular reason for this? Similarly, for the CAhA selma'o
> > >and the fact that CAhA + NAI is ungrammatical?
> >
> > Probably it is ungrammatical either because a) we never thought of adding a
> > rule for CAhA+NAI because we couldn't think of what such a thing might
> > mean
>
>This seems to bias s-w effects, doesn't it?

Not likely, since there has been no plan to examine S-W effects based on 
the tense system.
--
lojbab [email-masked]
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org