From lojbab@lojban.org Wed Dec 19 20:09:54 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 20 Dec 2001 04:09:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 96760 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2001 04:09:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 20 Dec 2001 04:09:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-2.cais.net) (205.252.14.72) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Dec 2001 04:09:53 -0000 Received: from bob.lojban.org (209-8-89-145.dial-up.cais.com [209.8.89.145] (may be forged)) by stmpy-2.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id fBK49pi73692 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 23:09:51 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20011219230618.0525e100@pop.cais.com> X-Sender: vir1036@pop.cais.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 23:08:11 -0500 To: Subject: Re: [lojban] Logical translation request In-Reply-To: References: <4.3.2.7.2.20011218021856.00c40680@pop.cais.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1120595 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbab At 06:49 PM 12/18/01 -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: >On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote: > > At 12:14 AM 12/18/01 -0500, Rob Speer wrote: > > > > >Is there any particular reason for this? Similarly, for the CAhA selma'o > > >and the fact that CAhA + NAI is ungrammatical? > > > > Probably it is ungrammatical either because a) we never thought of adding a > > rule for CAhA+NAI because we couldn't think of what such a thing might > > mean > >This seems to bias s-w effects, doesn't it? Not likely, since there has been no plan to examine S-W effects based on the tense system. -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org