Subject: Re: [lojban] Binary Language

From: Invent Yourself <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 04:12:38 -0500 (EST)

On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Rob Speer wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 05:58:17AM -0000, thinkit41 wrote:
> >
> > Any comments?
>
>
> Your grammar is entirely incomprehensible, seeing as you made up the
> notation as you went along and didn't explain it anywhere.

I especially choked on this piece:

"An idea is the basic word of the language. They are divided into 0, 1, 2
with focus 1, and 2 with focus 2 argument ideas, as well as base and
custom."

Now, "base" and "custom" get defined only after this sentence, "focus"
never gets defined at all, and even with those terms understood I just
can't parse the grammar of that sentence.

-- 
The tao that can be tar(1)ed
is not the entire Tao.
The path that can be specified
is not the Full Path.