From araizen@newmail.net Sat Dec 22 12:47:18 2001
Return-Path: <araizen@newmail.net>
X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 22 Dec 2001 20:47:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 10143 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2001 20:47:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m4.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Dec 2001 20:47:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO enigma.barak.net.il) (212.150.48.99)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Dec 2001 20:47:17 -0000
Received: from out.newmail.net ([10.10.11.11]) by enigma.barak.net.il
  (InterMail vK.4.03.00.00 201-232-121 license 5444ddd44659357c6c93343e0ce38507)
  with SMTP id <20011222204801.IGNK1225.enigma@out.newmail.net>;
  Sat, 22 Dec 2001 22:48:01 +0200
Received: from default ([62.0.181.73]) by out.newmail.net ; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 22:48:05 +0200
Message-ID: <006f01c18b90$4467f660$49b5003e@default>
To: "Engelang" <engelang@yahoogroups.com>,
  <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
References: <a017dp+9ei5@eGroups.com> <20011222073959.GA1993@twcny.rr.com>
Subject: [OT] Re: [lojban] Binary Language
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 08:59:43 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
From: "Adam Raizen" <araizen@newmail.net>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=3063669
X-Yahoo-Profile: araizen

la rab.spir. cusku di'e

> [1] HP49 Basic is a programming language for the HP49 calculator
which
> serves no purpose except to mollify people who want to program the
> calculator yet have a morbid fear of Reverse Polish Notation. It is
the
> same as the calculator's RPN language, except rewritten with
functions,
> parentheses, and infix operators, with some arbitrary notation added
on
> to fake the existence of a stack. I am reminded of this by Thinkit's
> after-the-fact "parentheses".

I once thought about implementing a "reverse polish" loglan which
would be more or less isomorphic to lojban, i.e. all terminators and
scope-marking would be implicit in the structure of the grammar
*without* using explicit words. There was an exchange on
alt.language.artificial which was forwarded to the lojban list a while
ago (see
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=krji1t8dhms8k8tuk5562nn7gk5rj7lh0
d%404ax.com ), and though lojbab claims that lojban fits the bill,
it's terminators are spoken punctuation marks, I think. I
unfortunately haven't had much time to develop it.

mu'o mi'e .adam.



