From pycyn@aol.com Tue Jan 01 07:32:08 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 1 Jan 2002 15:32:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 43184 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2002 15:32:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Jan 2002 15:32:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m02.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.5) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Jan 2002 15:32:07 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id r.13f.70e85f6 (3949) for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 10:31:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <13f.70e85f6.29633067@aol.com> Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 10:31:51 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] What are you doing now?? To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_13f.70e85f6.29633067_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_13f.70e85f6.29633067_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 12/31/2001 10:30:35 PM Central Standard Time, ragnarok@pobox.com writes: > It is no more or less lojbanic than the use of Tengwar or Cyrillic or even > of the letter h instead of ' - I don't see you ranting about And writing > 'fuhivla' instead of 'fu'ivla' - You're right; I haven't muttered about And on that particular score lately, though I have had a go at Tengwar within the last year. I don't object to your doing 'em, just to your calling them things useful to Lojban. By the way, And shouldn't use 'h' for ''' ; it is multiply misleading -- as tengwar and the like usually are not, at least. --part1_13f.70e85f6.29633067_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 12/31/2001 10:30:35 PM Central Standard Time, ragnarok@pobox.com writes:


It is no more or less lojbanic than the use of Tengwar or Cyrillic or even
of the letter h instead of ' - I don't see you ranting about And writing
'fuhivla' instead of 'fu'ivla' -

You're right; I haven't muttered about And on that particular score lately, though I have had a go at Tengwar within the last year.  I don't object to your doing 'em, just to your calling them things useful to Lojban.  By the way, And shouldn't use 'h' for ''' ; it is multiply misleading -- as tengwar and the like usually are not, at least. --part1_13f.70e85f6.29633067_boundary--