From jcrossco@bellsouth.net Fri Jan 04 13:48:45 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcrossco@bellsouth.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 4 Jan 2002 21:48:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 92494 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2002 21:48:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m6.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Jan 2002 21:48:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n33.groups.yahoo.com) (216.115.96.83) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2002 21:48:44 -0000 Received: from [216.115.96.146] by n33.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2002 21:48:42 -0000 Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 21:48:38 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: cmavo index? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 545 X-Mailer: Yahoo Groups Message Poster From: "buzzwyrd" X-Originating-IP: 24.98.21.225 X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=83886082 X-Yahoo-Profile: buzzwyrd --- In lojban@y..., Invent Yourself wrote: > There is so much broken Lojban floating around that automatic entry > would be a problem. There's been lots of talk of an > example database, however. Search the Wiki for Dictionary stuff. > Personally, I think a good parser (and better yet, with a glosser) is very helpful to me. The machine gives objective and unrelenting feedback. And it could separate wheat from chaff of broken lojban. Examples with grammatical errors could be automatically annotated in the database.