Subject: RE: [lojban] crdlus. critique

From: Invent Yourself <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 20:03:37 -0500 (EST)

On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Craig wrote:

> >> Person: WHAT IS THE PYRAMID SUPPORTED BY?
> >> la prenu: .i le jipkubli se sarji ma
> >>
> >>Strictly a grammatical issue: {.i le jipkubli cu se sarji ma}
>
> >Why not just {i ma sarji le jipkubli}? Or, if keeping English
> >word order is important, {i ma le jipkubli cu sarji}?
>
> Or if you speak Lojban with SOV word order, in which case you would use {i
> ma le jipkubli cu sarji} if you weren't translating.

Isn't it a tad bit more Lojbanic to stick to the raw gismu order for bridi
places, and reserve SE for sumti only? (le se broda being the only way to
access broda2 for sumti)

-- 
The tao that can be tar(1)ed
is not the entire Tao.
The path that can be specified
is not the Full Path.