From pycyn@aol.com Mon Jan 07 01:32:03 2002
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 7 Jan 2002 09:32:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 59742 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2002 09:32:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167)
  by m12.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Jan 2002 09:32:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r10.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.106)
  by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jan 2002 09:32:02 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-r10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id r.ea.20a240db (4585)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 04:31:57 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <ea.20a240db.296ac50c@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 04:31:56 EST
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Lojban Text to Speech
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_ea.20a240db.296ac50c_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001
X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra

--part1_ea.20a240db.296ac50c_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 1/6/2002 5:03:29 PM Central Standard Time, 
ragnarok@pobox.com writes:


> I would like to also see use of varying sounds other than r - for instance,
> I (and I think PC as well, though I amn't sure) use /T/ instead of /h/ for
> {'}; I would like to have a Lojban TTS voice with that one.
> 

I do when I remember, but years of habit die hard and I do slip until I 
notice I am generating ambiguities between {V'V) and {VV}.

Cherlin:
<Actually, therre arre severral distinctive Amurrcan 'r's, and some 
that disappeah entially.>

I haven't seen anything lately on this claim, but the last I saw (and its 
ancestors for about a decade) was that, since just about everyone could come 
to regularly distinguish between r'd and r-less cases, the allophones of /r/ 
involved was not 0 but something way off the normal English spectrum, ranging 
-- various r'less dialects -- from pitch-stress-juncture to pharyngealization 
through retroflexion and a number of other odd things with the back of the 
tongue . They just hid a bit, but they don't disappear. Unless something 
new has turned up beyond the old mechanical sound spectrograms.


--part1_ea.20a240db.296ac50c_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2>In a message dated 1/6/2002 5:03:29 PM Central Standard Time, ragnarok@pobox.com writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">I would like to also see use of varying sounds other than r - for instance,<BR>
I (and I think PC as well, though I amn't sure) use /T/ instead of /h/ for<BR>
{'}; I would like to have a Lojban TTS voice with that one.<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
I do when I remember, but years of habit die hard and I do slip until I notice I am generating ambiguities between {V'V) and {VV}.<BR>
<BR>
Cherlin:<BR>
&lt;Actually, therre arre severral distinctive Amurrcan 'r's, and some <BR>
that disappeah entially.&gt;<BR>
<BR>
I haven't seen anything lately on this claim, but the last I saw (and its ancestors for about a decade) was that, since just about everyone could come to regularly distinguish between r'd and r-less cases, the allophones of /r/ involved was not 0 but something way off the normal English spectrum, ranging -- various r'less dialects -- from pitch-stress-juncture to pharyngealization through retroflexion and a number of other odd things with the back of the tongue .&nbsp; They just hid a bit, but they don't disappear.&nbsp; Unless something new has turned up beyond the old mechanical sound spectrograms.<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
--part1_ea.20a240db.296ac50c_boundary--

