From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Tue Jan 08 09:16:35 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 8 Jan 2002 17:16:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 92030 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2002 17:16:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m5.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Jan 2002 17:16:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2002 17:16:34 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:51:23 +0000 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 08 Jan 2002 17:16:50 +0000 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 17:16:10 +0000 To: lojban Subject: RE: [lojban] What are you doing now?? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline From: And Rosta X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810630 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin >>> Craig 01/01/02 04:30am >>> #>How is this Lojban related? We have enough pains in the butt with latin #scrip[t without bringing in yet one (or two or three) more. I don't care = if #you do >it (I do it myself from time to time -- trying to fill various gri= ds #for example) but don't call it Lojban. # #It is no more or less lojbanic than the use of Tengwar or Cyrillic or even #of the letter h instead of ' - I don't see you ranting about And writing #'fuhivla' instead of 'fu'ivla'=20 Hey, hang on: while it is true that of old I was known as an arrant orthographic dissenter, I'm a paragon of meekly ovine conformity=20 these days, & is the spelling I use when using the word *in English*. Jorge does likewise. & in answer to Greg's question: I'm doing no Lojban at all these days. Too busy with other stuff. --And.