From lojbanlists@wonderclown.com Wed Jan 09 17:10:51 2002
Return-Path: <randy@wonderclown.com>
X-Sender: randy@wonderclown.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 10 Jan 2002 01:10:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 12723 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 01:10:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167)
  by m11.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Jan 2002 01:10:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail8.nc.rr.com) (24.93.67.55)
  by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2002 01:10:50 -0000
Received: from aerosol ([66.57.85.38]) by mail8.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.687.68);
  Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:10:49 -0500
Received: from rnortman by aerosol with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
  id 16OTk1-0002rJ-00
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 09 Jan 2002 20:10:49 -0500
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:10:49 -0500
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Relative Clauses and Connectives
Message-ID: <20020110011048.GA10286@aerosol>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
Sender: Randall Nortman <randy@wonderclown.com>
Return-Path: randy@wonderclown.com
From: "randl. nortmn." <lojbanlists@wonderclown.com>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=91794573
X-Yahoo-Profile: uyndrklaun

Consider the following structure:

ko'a .e ko'e noi broda

In this case, it seems that "noi broda" attaches only to "ko'e", not
to both "ko'a" and "ko'e". How might one introduce a relative clause
meant to be attached to both? Is it even possible?

mu'omi'e randl.