Subject: RE: [lojban] po'u considered harmful

From: "Craig" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:05:03 -0500

>> I had been interpreting the Book's statement (in chapter 8) that po'u
means
>> poi du as meaning that po'u means poi du.

>That means that it is semantically (but not syntactically)
>interchangeable.

This is a little bit of a strange statement for you to be making, seeing as
you are the one who doesn't clarify po'u except to say 'note that it means
poi du' and state its selma'o (unless this oversight was fixed in the print
version).

BTW, I did not need two copies of this message.