From jjllambias@hotmail.com Wed Jan 16 04:18:14 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 16 Jan 2002 12:18:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 86565 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2002 12:18:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m8.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 Jan 2002 12:18:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.212) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2002 12:18:13 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 04:18:13 -0800 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:18:13 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: RE: [lojban] po'u considered harmful Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:18:13 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jan 2002 12:18:13.0663 (UTC) FILETIME=[DEAB5AF0:01C19E87] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la kreig cusku di'e >Unless {ko'a goi lei ci broda}, because then {lei ci broda du le ci broda} >- >which I assume you are going to agree with. No, I don't. The mass of three is not equal to each of the three. Even if you take {lei ci broda} as {pisu'o lei ci broda}, which I don't, it is still false that some part of the mass is equal to each of the three. In the pisu'o case though it is true that {le ci broda du piusu'o lei ci broda}, each of the three is equal to some part of the mass. But the order of the quantifiers is relevant! >Since part of the mass that is >ko'a is the pamai broda, the whole mass has the property of being the pamai >broda; the same goes for the remai and cimai. The whole mass does not have all the properties of its parts, only some of them. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com