From jjllambias@hotmail.com Thu Jan 17 09:56:59 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 17 Jan 2002 17:56:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 58884 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 17:56:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m11.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Jan 2002 17:56:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.15) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2002 17:56:59 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:56:59 -0800 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:56:58 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] le ticrai since Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:56:58 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jan 2002 17:56:59.0213 (UTC) FILETIME=[5C0DE7D0:01C19F80] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la pier cusku di'e >How about {ko na citka gi'e na pencu .itezu'ebo do na mrobi'o}? That's the best so far. I don't know whether the scope of {ko} extends to a bo-joined bridi or not, and what the claim status of the second part is, but it does solve the problem with {na}. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.