From jjllambias@hotmail.com Thu Jan 17 09:56:59 2002
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 17 Jan 2002 17:56:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 58884 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 17:56:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m11.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Jan 2002 17:56:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.15)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2002 17:56:59 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
  Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:56:59 -0800
Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
  Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:56:58 GMT
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Bcc: 
Subject: Re: [lojban] le ticrai since
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:56:58 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F15oSn03t3Z4d5htAyD0001f6b8@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jan 2002 17:56:59.0213 (UTC) FILETIME=[5C0DE7D0:01C19F80]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2]
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566
X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000


la pier cusku di'e

>How about {ko na citka gi'e na pencu .itezu'ebo do na mrobi'o}?

That's the best so far. I don't know whether the scope of {ko}
extends to a bo-joined bridi or not, and what the claim status
of the second part is, but it does solve the problem with {na}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.