From edward.cherlin.sy.67@aya.yale.edu Mon Jan 28 00:25:53 2002
Return-Path: <cherlin@pacbell.net>
X-Sender: cherlin@pacbell.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 28 Jan 2002 08:25:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 55679 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2002 08:25:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172)
  by m11.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Jan 2002 08:25:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta7.pltn13.pbi.net) (64.164.98.8)
  by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Jan 2002 08:25:51 -0000
Received: from there ([216.102.199.245])
  by mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001))
  with SMTP id <0GQN00D7Q3F30E@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net> for lojban@yahoogroups.com;
  Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:25:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:25:51 -0800
Subject: Free Software (or Open Source) (was Re: [lojban] Perl "drill"
  program...)
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201240901160.5975-100000@escher.ties.org>
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Message-id: <0GQN00D7R3F30E@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net>
Organization: Web for Humans
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1]
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201240901160.5975-100000@escher.ties.org>
X-eGroups-From: Edward Cherlin <cherlin@pacbell.net>
From: Edward Cherlin <edward.cherlin.sy.67@aya.yale.edu>
Reply-To: edward@webforhumans.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=31895329
X-Yahoo-Profile: echerlin

On Thursday 24 January 2002 06:05 am, Deven T. Corzine wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, John Cowan wrote:
> > Deven T. Corzine wrote:
> > > Okay, I realize I'm responding to a year-old message here.=20
> > > That shows how much time I find to keep up with this mailing
> > > list, much less study Lojban!
> >
> > In Lojban, no thread is ever truly dead.

Yes, I intend to bring up the anti-ka thread again from, I think,=20
four years ago as soon as I find out what the refgrammar has to say=20
on the various components of the subject. I got my copy just a few=20
weeks ago, and have been plowing steadily through it.

> Is that good or bad? :-)

It's vital.

> > > It wasn't a perfect program, and I never released it, but it
> > > worked very effectively for me...
> >
> > Sounds interesting. Please do release it with an Open Source
> > license; http://www.opensource.org/licenses

Better, yet, register it as a project at SourceForge,=20
http://sourceforge.net, and let other people hack on it. I could do=20
with a version that understood Unicode, for my daughter who is=20
studying Japanese, and for other uses.

> I'm not sure it's in a form suitable for release at the moment --
> maybe I should clean it up a bit first. I'll have to take a look
> at it. (Don't let me forget!)
>
> Assuming I release it (and I probably will), I would use an Open
> Source license for it, though I don't know offhand which one...
>
> Deven

I won't argue the merits of Free Software vs. Open Source vs. BSD=20
etc. licensing here. There are plenty of other places to do it. :-)
--=20

Edward Cherlin
edward@webforhumans.com
Does your Web site work?

