From xod@sixgirls.org Mon Jan 28 07:49:51 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 28 Jan 2002 15:49:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 11783 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2002 15:49:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m10.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Jan 2002 15:49:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (216.27.131.50) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Jan 2002 15:49:50 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0SFnmu02762 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 10:49:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 10:49:47 -0500 (EST) To: lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] Bible translation style question In-Reply-To: <0201281040332T.30016@neofelis> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1138703 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Monday 28 January 2002 10:32, Invent Yourself wrote: > > Can't we actively notice these behaviors and work against them? That is > > what Pierre was doing, in trying to move away from using SE and FA to > > simulate Englishistic word ordering. > > I'm not trying to simulate Englishistic word ordering - "God told the woman > 'blah'" comes out as "God said 'blah' the woman", even for very long blah, > which is to'e glico. Yes. I meant that you were trying to steer away from the Englishistic word ordering. -- The tao that can be tar(1)ed is not the entire Tao. The path that can be specified is not the Full Path.