Subject: Re: [lojban] signs and seasons and days and years

From: Invent Yourself <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:26:17 -0500 (EST)

On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Pierre Abbat wrote:

> On Tuesday 29 January 2002 12:42, [email-masked] wrote:
> > In a message dated 1/29/2002 10:07:18 AM Central Standard Time,
> >
> > [email-masked] writes:
> > > Adam suggested {ca'e}.
> >
> > How about an imperative with {ko} identified as the lights. How did you do
> > "fiat lux" at the beginning?
>
> My version (I may have rearranged the words):
> .i la cevni cu cusku lu ko gusni li'u .ije co'a gusni
> Mark's version:
> .i bacru fa la cevni lu .e'o gusni li'u .ijebo gusni

C cusku lu ca'e da gusni li'u .iseni'ibo co'a gusni

You've got the existence in the da, and the ni'i because we're supposed to
be dealing with something that's as fundamental as logic.

-- 
The tao that can be tar(1)ed
is not the entire Tao.
The path that can be specified
is not the Full Path.