From xod@sixgirls.org Fri Feb 01 10:28:46 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 1 Feb 2002 18:28:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 19718 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2002 18:28:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m10.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Feb 2002 18:28:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (216.27.131.50) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2002 18:28:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g11ISiF07855 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:28:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:28:43 -0500 (EST) To: lojban Subject: RE: Truth Value of UI (was: Re: UI for 'possible' (was: Re: [lojban] Bibletranslation style question) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1138703 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Craig wrote: > vi'o. I propose this: if '.ui' had a truth value, then it would be > indistinguishable from 'mi gleki' - and thus there would have been no need > to create it, as we could use 'mi gleki' instead. You realize, of course, that this is a corollary and not a contradiction at all. A reductio, but not to anything absurd! -- The tao that can be tar(1)ed is not the entire Tao. The path that can be specified is not the Full Path.