Subject: Re: [lojban] utterances; UI

From: Invent Yourself <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:02:42 -0500 (EST)

On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 [email-masked] wrote:

> 3) as for the truth values of UI, i side with the no-truth-value-ers, though
> i can see the point about smoke lying.

So a smoke signal can have a truth value, but a word that's both written
and spoken doesn't?

-- 
The tao that can be tar(1)ed
is not the entire Tao.
The path that can be specified
is not the Full Path.