From xod@sixgirls.org Sat Feb 02 11:02:45 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 2 Feb 2002 19:02:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 91587 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2002 19:02:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Feb 2002 19:02:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (216.27.131.50) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2002 19:02:44 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g12J2gi22847 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:02:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:02:42 -0500 (EST) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] utterances; UI In-Reply-To: <88.13421c9c.298d590a@aol.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1138703 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 BestATN@aol.com wrote: > 3) as for the truth values of UI, i side with the no-truth-value-ers, though > i can see the point about smoke lying. So a smoke signal can have a truth value, but a word that's both written and spoken doesn't? -- The tao that can be tar(1)ed is not the entire Tao. The path that can be specified is not the Full Path.