Subject: Re: UI for 'possible' (was: Re: [lojban] Bible translation style question)

From: "Adam Raizen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 03:44:42 +0200

la pycyn. cusku di'e

> > Why are those the only two possibilities? Maybe 'sei mi pacna'
> > functions to give 'mi pacna le du'u ko'a klama'.
> >
>
> Try as I might, I can't read the stuff in the Refgram about {sei} to
allow
> this: it is a not a metalinguistic comment on the discourse, it is
simply a
> statement of my state of hope.

It is a metalinguistic comment on the main bridi, and in this case it
tells you that that bridi is not being claimed, but it is still the
topic of discussion.

mu'o mi'e .adam.