From xod@sixgirls.org Sun Feb 03 19:06:39 2002
Return-Path: <xod@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 4 Feb 2002 03:06:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 61752 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2002 03:06:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167)
  by m5.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Feb 2002 03:06:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (216.27.131.50)
  by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2002 03:06:38 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
  by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g1436bR10617
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 3 Feb 2002 22:06:37 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 22:06:36 -0500 (EST)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Truth Value of UI (was: Re: UI for 'possible' (was: Re: [lojban]
  Bibletranslation style question)
In-Reply-To: <00bb01c1acf0$3ae06ec0$a02103d5@oemcomputer>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0202032204350.10513-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1138703
X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple

On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, G. Dyke wrote:

> <And and Xod exchange various proposals, one of them thinks UI have truth
> values, the other doesn't ; I can't figure out what their various arguments
> have to do with it>
>
> I think I'm with And, but I'm not sure...


Can you draw a real distinction between ".ui" and "mi gleki"? And thinks
he can, but hasn't been able to convince me that he has.



-- 
The tao that can be tar(1)ed
is not the entire Tao.
The path that can be specified
is not the Full Path.


