From ragnarok@pobox.com Sun Feb 10 13:52:47 2002
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_2); 10 Feb 2002 21:52:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 2789 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2002 21:52:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172)
  by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Feb 2002 21:52:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.246)
  by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Feb 2002 21:52:46 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.98] by intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id ABED90C3007C; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 16:53:49 -0500
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] le ninmu cukta
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 16:52:45 -0500
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFAEPLCFAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <a45ula+lpre@eGroups.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382
X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl

>Same would be with the 1993 definition of {cukta} where x2 was 
>a subject/theme/story. With the present (1994) definition where
>x2 is the content the effect is lost, however.

Huh. I thought subject matter was a subset of content. I guess not.