From jjllambias@hotmail.com Thu Feb 14 19:43:42 2002
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_2); 15 Feb 2002 03:43:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 20445 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2002 03:43:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m8.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 Feb 2002 03:43:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.240.130)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Feb 2002 03:43:42 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
  Thu, 14 Feb 2002 19:43:42 -0800
Received: from 200.69.6.13 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
  Fri, 15 Feb 2002 03:43:41 GMT
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Bcc: 
Subject: Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 03:43:41 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F255LIs0LP6tnlKTqal000173bb@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2002 03:43:42.0035 (UTC) FILETIME=[F6234230:01C1B5D2]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: [200.69.6.13]
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566
X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000


la pycyn cusku di'e

>Jeez, ya mean I've been teaching set theory wrong for 35 years -- including
>the adequacy proofs? Of course 1 as a function has no domain: look at it, 
>NO
>argument, ergo no domain.

Then it's a different function than the one xod and I had been
discussing. We were talking of one that mapped a series of
propositions to a constant value of 1.

Is a function the way you use the word something different than
a mapping?

><Of course we need names for functions. What we don't need is
>a place for the name in the predicate for 'function'!>
>
>But the function of {fancu} is precisely to introduce/define functions -- 
>not
>an easy thing to do otherwise -- at least wordy.

It would be interesting to see actual examples. I can think
of ways to introduce/define a function that do not involve
a place for the name. For example, if we want to define the
function F as the mapping from x to x+1 we can say:

sa'e roda zo'u fancu da le sumji be da bei li pa boi fy
def: For all x, x is mapped to x+1 by the function F.

I don't see the need to put {zo fy} in the x1 place.

mu'o mi'e xorxes






_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


