From pycyn@aol.com Fri Feb 15 07:47:15 2002
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_2); 15 Feb 2002 15:47:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 50665 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2002 15:47:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167)
  by m8.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 Feb 2002 15:47:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m07.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.162)
  by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Feb 2002 15:47:14 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-m07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id r.87.17958aff (4405)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:47:10 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <87.17958aff.299e877e@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:47:10 EST
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] Non-logical AND in Tanru?
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_87.17958aff.299e877e_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001
X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra

--part1_87.17958aff.299e877e_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Add on.
It should be noted that generally it is a good idea to sort out the sumti for 
various predicates in a tanru late in the disambiguation process. That is, a 
tanru like (finpe je mirli kalte} does not require that there be sumti for 
{finpe je mirli}, ones for {finpe} and {morli} separately are enough. The 
way the examples have been handled show that violating this guideline has not 
been nuch of a temptation, but it may be useful to have it explicit.

--part1_87.17958aff.299e877e_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2>Add on.<BR>
It should be noted that generally it is a good idea to sort out the sumti for various predicates in a tanru late in the disambiguation process.&nbsp; That is, a tanru like (finpe je mirli kalte} does not require that there be sumti for {finpe je mirli}, ones for {finpe} and {morli} separately are enough.&nbsp; The way the examples have been handled show that violating this guideline has not been nuch of a temptation, but it may be useful to have it explicit.</FONT></HTML>

--part1_87.17958aff.299e877e_boundary--

