From jjllambias@hotmail.com Mon Feb 18 17:20:11 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_2); 19 Feb 2002 01:20:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 9000 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2002 01:17:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Feb 2002 01:17:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.238) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2002 01:17:30 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:17:29 -0800 Received: from 200.69.6.23 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 01:17:29 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [loglanists] Sets Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 01:17:29 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2002 01:17:29.0813 (UTC) FILETIME=[33236850:01C1B8E3] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.69.6.23] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la djan cusku di'e >This clash can be resolved in one of two ways: decide that "All swans >are white" has no existential import either, or decide that "For all X >etc." is not a fully adequate mapping of "All swans etc." >Lojban takes the second view, Not my dialect of Lojban! For me {ro broda naku} is equivalent to {naku su'o broda}, which would fail if {ro broda} had existential import. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com