From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Wed Feb 20 11:03:43 2002
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_2); 20 Feb 2002 19:03:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 16266 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2002 19:03:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172)
  by m2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 20 Feb 2002 19:03:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2002 19:03:41 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
  Wed, 20 Feb 2002 18:37:11 +0000
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
  with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:03:28 +0000
Message-Id: <sc73f300.016@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:03:14 +0000
To: cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, jjllambias <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
Cc: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810630
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

John:
#>>> John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> 02/19/02 12:00am >>>
#Jorge Llambias scripsit:
#> xod: x1 is a name and x4 is the function
#> cowan: x1 is the function and x4 is an expression (a text)
#> lojbab: x1 is the function and x4 is something like li f(x)=3Dx*2,
#> which is not very clear what it is because equations
#> are not numbers.
#> pc: x1=3Dx4 both are the function, with the proviso that good style
#> requires to use a more helpful description in x4.
#>=20
#> I much prefer pc's version over any of the others, although even
#> better for me would be to drop x4 altoghether.
#
#I don't see how that can work. Given that x1 is a function (rejecting
#xod's view), an abstract object, you need some x4 to tell you which
#function it is. A function is not just any mapping between the
#elements of the domain and the range, it is some particular mapping.
#such as "successor", "ancestor", "solely owned by", or what have you.
#
#Consider the set of clock numbers: {12, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11}=
.
#Use this as the domain and range of two functions: "an hour later than"
#and "an hour earlier than". Without an x4, you can't tell which is
#which.

I see the argument. I don't think it's right. The relationship between
"the function" and "an hour later than" is an appositive/equative one,
as Jorge & pc have been saying. Likewise we don't add an extra sumti to "pr=
enu" to specify the name of the person -- "le prenu" tells you it's a=20
person, but not which person; "le fancu" would tell you it's a function, bu=
t=20
not which function. So, to solve your problem, po'u should be used,
not this spurious x4.

--And.


