From thanatos@dim.com Tue Feb 26 10:52:54 2002
Return-Path: <thanatos@dim.com>
X-Sender: thanatos@dim.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: unknown); 26 Feb 2002 18:52:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 33029 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2002 18:52:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172)
  by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Feb 2002 18:52:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO supernova.dimensional.com) (206.124.0.11)
  by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2002 18:52:53 -0000
Received: from p08.3c07.pm.dimcom.net (p08.3c07.pm.dimcom.net [206.124.5.72])
  by supernova.dimensional.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id g1QIqqf29003
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:52:52 -0700 (MST)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: go'i: repeated referents or just sumti?
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:58:47 -0700
Message-ID: <3skn7ugfa3vfc970iuq5lvshf58651ee4a@4ax.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: EWC <thanatos@dim.com>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=45881577
X-Yahoo-Profile: thandim2000

Does {go'i} repeat the referents of the sumti of the previous the bridi
or just the sumti? That is, does {le mlatu cu catlu mi. i go'i le
gerku} necessarily refer to the same cats in the second statement or
just another group of {ro le su'o mlatu}?

Is
le mlatu cu catlu mi. i go'i le gerku
the same as
le mlatu cu catlu mi. i le mlatu cu catlu le gerku
or
le mlatu cu catlu mi. e le gerku
?

In the last the same X described as a cat looks at both me and the dog,
while in the middle one the X looking at me is not necessarily the Y
looking at the dog.

Which one is {go'i} equivalent to?

--=20
EWC

