From pycyn@aol.com Thu Feb 28 16:13:07 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 1 Mar 2002 00:13:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 64450 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2002 00:13:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Mar 2002 00:13:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r03.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.99) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2002 00:13:06 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id r.92.220bbdf1 (4322) for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 19:12:45 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <92.220bbdf1.29b0218a@aol.com> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 19:12:58 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] laudz To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_92.220bbdf1.29b0218a_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_92.220bbdf1.29b0218a_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2/28/2002 4:21:41 PM Central Standard Time, ragnarok@pobox.com writes: > >le velkla poi klama fo ke'a na ve klama > > ki'a .i ro velkla cu ve klama .ije roda poi fo ke'a klama ku cu ve klama > .ija'e ro velkla poi klama fo ke'a cu ve klama .ija'e ki'a > I'm just trying to translate it, not explain it. The original is roughly (so far as I can figure it out after years of reading about it) "Way (which is) wayed not way" The above is trying to keep that structure as near as can be. Any absurdity that results is almost certainly in the original (I await aulun to stomp on that assumption). Serious befuddlement is the beginning of enlightenment, or so. --part1_92.220bbdf1.29b0218a_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2/28/2002 4:21:41 PM Central Standard Time, ragnarok@pobox.com writes:


>le velkla poi klama fo ke'a na ve klama

ki'a .i ro velkla cu ve klama .ije roda poi fo ke'a klama ku cu ve klama
.ija'e ro velkla poi klama fo ke'a cu ve klama .ija'e ki'a


I'm just trying to translate it, not explain it.  The original is roughly (so far as I can figure it out after years of reading about it) "Way (which is) wayed not way" The above is trying to keep that structure as near as can be.  Any absurdity that results is almost certainly in  the original  (I await aulun to stomp on that assumption).
Serious befuddlement is the beginning of enlightenment, or so.
 --part1_92.220bbdf1.29b0218a_boundary--