From pycyn@aol.com Fri Mar 01 17:41:45 2002
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: unknown); 2 Mar 2002 01:41:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 37871 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2002 01:41:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167)
  by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Mar 2002 01:41:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m08.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.163)
  by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2002 01:41:44 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-m08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id r.6c.184f3000 (18708)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 20:41:39 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <6c.184f3000.29b187d3@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 20:41:39 EST
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_6c.184f3000.29b187d3_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118
From: pycyn@aol.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001
X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra

--part1_6c.184f3000.29b187d3_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 3/1/2002 3:00:33 PM Central Standard Time, 
jcowan@reutershealth.com writes:

< "ny. le mlatu" is a single sumti meaning "N of
>the cats I have in mind".
> xorxes> It is??? Don't you need {vei ny}?
> 
> Yes, of course you do *brain fart*>
> 
I'm afraid I don't see how putting a left parenthesis in front changes it 
from whatever it was before to a number. (BTW, the example of {vei} in the 
book, 18.5.10 (437) is a total muck-up of use-mention conventions -- or else 
this whole thing is more idiotically complex than even I have come to see it 
to be. I take it as evidence of the overall confusion in this particular 
area.) Ahah! 17.11.6 (423) a desperate way to avoid an ambiguity created 
somewhere back at the beginning of all this, I suspect (and the use-mention 
is really bad in this example, too -- flat wrong in fact.)

--part1_6c.184f3000.29b187d3_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2>In a message dated 3/1/2002 3:00:33 PM Central Standard Time, jcowan@reutershealth.com writes:<BR>
<BR>
&lt; "ny. le mlatu" is a single sumti meaning "N of<BR>
&gt;the cats I have in mind".<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">xorxes&gt; It is??? Don't you need {vei ny}?<BR>
<BR>
Yes, of course you do *brain fart*&gt;<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
I'm afraid I don't see how putting a left parenthesis in front changes it from whatever it was before to a number. (BTW, the example of {vei} in the book, 18.5.10 (437) is a total muck-up of use-mention conventions -- or else this whole thing is more idiotically complex than even I have come to see it to be.&nbsp; I take it as evidence of the overall confusion in this particular area.) Ahah! 17.11.6 (423) a desperate way to avoid an ambiguity created somewhere back at the beginning of all this, I suspect (and the use-mention is really bad in this example, too -- flat wrong in fact.)<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
--part1_6c.184f3000.29b187d3_boundary--

