From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri Mar 01 18:17:11 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 2 Mar 2002 02:17:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 90531 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2002 02:17:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Mar 2002 02:17:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.48) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2002 02:17:10 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 18:17:10 -0800 Received: from 200.69.6.17 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 02 Mar 2002 02:17:10 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 02:17:10 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2002 02:17:10.0890 (UTC) FILETIME=[5C2BA4A0:01C1C190] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.69.6.17] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la pycyn cusku di'e >I would like to see an example. The mass of texts in my library is not >obviously a text. What does it collaborate to do or have done to it that >clearly marks it as a text? Consider the text of each chapter of a book. Then the mass of texts from all chapters are the text of the book, they collaborate to be the text of the book. >though I think that the mass of a single dog is different from the dog >itself -- and certainly from any other dog, so not a dog at all. Well, I guess we'll just disagree about that one. How about a mass of many waters, can it be water? > > >Since that seems to be the question I'm asking, how are these critters >related, this hardly helps any. I can can do circles on my own -- but can >you all break out of yours? Sorry, I don't know how else to say it. I write {li 4 sumji li 2 li 2} and read out /li pa sumji li re li re/. Then I write {A prami mi} and read out /abu prami mi/. >are they for?> > >Well, you seem to use them in preference to the lower case ones at this >point, for one thing. I don't use the word "ga'e abu". I use the symbol "A" to represent in writing the word "abu", just as I use the symbol "1" to represent in writing the word "pa". >You just don't refer to them correctly. I don't want to refer to them (capital letters) at all. I'm just using them. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.