From rob@twcny.rr.com Fri Mar 01 19:24:47 2002
Return-Path: <rob@twcny.rr.com>
X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: unknown); 2 Mar 2002 03:24:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 6955 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2002 03:24:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Mar 2002 03:24:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailout6.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.177)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2002 03:24:46 -0000
Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-1 [24.92.226.139])
  by mailout6.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id g223Oku22489
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 22:24:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com
  (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
  ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2002 22:24:44 -0500
Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
  id 16h08b-0000UG-00
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 01 Mar 2002 22:24:45 -0500
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 22:24:45 -0500
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies
Message-ID: <20020302032445.GC1806@twcny.rr.com>
References: <199.31114e6.29b187d4@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <199.31114e6.29b187d4@aol.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com
From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2572649
X-Yahoo-Profile: squeekybobo

On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 08:41:40PM -0500, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> Yes, but who uses those strange shifted letteral words? What
> are they for?>
> 
> Well, you seem to use them in preference to the lower case ones at this 
> point, for one thing. You just don't refer to them correctly.

'A' is just an abbreviation for {abu}; this does not say that {abu}
actually refers to a capital 'A'.

There is no abbreviation for {tau abu}, which does refer to a capital
'A', which is justifiable because as far as I know, {tau} and its
friends have not been used in any actual Lojban text.

-- 
la rAs:r
noi sarji zo gumri poi gis5


