From rob@twcny.rr.com Sat Mar 02 22:18:45 2002
Return-Path: <rob@twcny.rr.com>
X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: unknown); 3 Mar 2002 06:18:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 3555 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2002 06:18:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172)
  by m12.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Mar 2002 06:18:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailout5.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.122)
  by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Mar 2002 06:18:44 -0000
Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-0 [24.92.226.74])
  by mailout5.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id g236IgM20059
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 01:18:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com
  (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
  ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 01:18:42 -0500
Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
  id 16hPKU-0000sU-00
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 03 Mar 2002 01:18:42 -0500
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 01:18:42 -0500
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Anything but tautologies
Message-ID: <20020303061842.GA2874@twcny.rr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com
From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2572649
X-Yahoo-Profile: squeekybobo

I accidentally replied to pycyn (PLEASE munge the reply-to!), so I'm
forwarding his response.

----- Forwarded message from Pycyn@aol.com -----

Envelope-to: rob@localhost
Delivery-date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 01:16:30 -0500
From: Pycyn@aol.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies
To: rob@twcny.rr.com

In a message dated 3/1/2002 9:25:53 PM Central Standard Time, 
rob@twcny.rr.com writes:


> 'A' is just an abbreviation for {abu}; this does not say that {abu}
> actually refers to a capital 'A'.
> 
> There is no abbreviation for {tau abu}, which does refer to a capital
> 'A', which is justifiable because as far as I know, {tau} and its
> friends have not been used in any actual Lojban text.
> 

An odd choice, since the natural would be "a," though that ccreates serious 
problems; maybe italic a. "A" is the natural abbreviation for {tau abu} or 
{ga'e abu}.
This is what I mean by the "system" being very strange.

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
la rab.spir
noi sarji zo gumri


