From jay.kominek@colorado.edu Mon Mar 11 09:05:34 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 11 Mar 2002 17:05:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 49000 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2002 17:05:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m11.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Mar 2002 17:05:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucsub.colorado.edu) (128.138.129.12) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2002 17:05:24 -0000 Received: from ucsub.colorado.edu (kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu [128.138.129.12]) by ucsub.colorado.edu (8.11.6/8.11.2/ITS-5.0/student) with ESMTP id g2BH5OI23584 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:05:24 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:05:24 -0700 (MST) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Programming Languages for Lojban In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE From: Jay Kominek X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=20706630 X-Yahoo-Profile: jfkominek On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Invent Yourself wrote: > If one were to try to parse Lojban and use it for the internal workings o= f > an inference engine, would Lisp or Prolog be more appropriate? I would venture to say Prolog (or some other logic programming language). Lojban is basically Prolog 'instructions', but remains data in Lisp (and other functional languages). - Jay Kominek Plus =C3=A7a change, plus c'est la m=C3=AAme chose