Subject: Re: [lojban] More about quantifiers

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:37:28 EST

In a message dated 3/12/2002 3:40:45 PM Central Standard Time, 
[email-masked] writes:

> In practice I don't expect these to be used, but they
> would be there in principle for those who want a complete
> system.
> 

Well, the {ma'u} might be useless, but the {ni'u} are much shorter than 
{ganai da S gi}, if someone has an occasion to use a free quantifier. With 
the Traditional system, integrating these critters in will be a bit of a 
problem, but we can always check back to ultimate forms to work out the 
details.