From pycyn@aol.com Tue Mar 12 14:37:33 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 12 Mar 2002 22:37:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 16682 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2002 22:37:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m5.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Mar 2002 22:37:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d08.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.40) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2002 22:37:33 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id r.102.11e38077 (4530) for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:37:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <102.11e38077.29bfdd28@aol.com> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:37:28 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] More about quantifiers To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_102.11e38077.29bfdd28_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra --part1_102.11e38077.29bfdd28_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/12/2002 3:40:45 PM Central Standard Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes: > In practice I don't expect these to be used, but they > would be there in principle for those who want a complete > system. > Well, the {ma'u} might be useless, but the {ni'u} are much shorter than {ganai da S gi}, if someone has an occasion to use a free quantifier. With the Traditional system, integrating these critters in will be a bit of a problem, but we can always check back to ultimate forms to work out the details. --part1_102.11e38077.29bfdd28_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/12/2002 3:40:45 PM Central Standard Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:


In practice I don't expect these to be used, but they
would be there in principle for those who want a complete
system.


Well, the {ma'u} might be useless, but the {ni'u} are much shorter than {ganai da S gi}, if someone has an occasion to use a free quantifier.  With the Traditional system, integrating these critters in will be a bit of a problem, but we can always check back to ultimate forms to work out the details. --part1_102.11e38077.29bfdd28_boundary--