From rizen@ispwest.com Tue Mar 12 18:52:09 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: rizen@ispwest.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 13 Mar 2002 02:52:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 6589 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2002 02:52:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m8.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Mar 2002 02:52:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ispwestemail.aceweb.net) (216.52.245.18) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2002 02:52:08 -0000 Received: from there (unverified [66.2.47.6]) by ispwestemail.aceweb.net (Vircom SMTPRS 1.2.221) with SMTP id for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:49:42 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] lojban application in wearable computing Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:48:24 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Ted Reed X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=104181342 X-Yahoo-Profile: xrizen On Tuesday, March 12 2002 03:37 pm, Invent Yourself wrote: > I tend to think that Lojban is useful here as a "native language" for such > devices, for internal use, testing & debugging and concept proofs, since > it's so much easier (in theory) to work with Lojban than any other > language. And once the bugs are worked out, an English/Lojban translation > layer is created. At least that's what I intend for my inference engine. > > So far, in seeking a language for that project, I have one vote for Lisp, > one for Prolog, and one for Rosetta! Looks like I will have to do due > diligence to break the tie. I personally think that lisp/scheme like languages would bear the most in common with lojban. Perhaps some python-esque attributes as well. -- rizen