From b.gohla@gmx.de Wed Mar 13 01:36:47 2002
Return-Path: <b.gohla@gmx.de>
X-Sender: b.gohla@gmx.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: unknown); 13 Mar 2002 09:36:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 75320 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2002 09:36:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Mar 2002 09:36:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2002 09:36:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 28499 invoked by uid 0); 13 Mar 2002 09:36:44 -0000
Received: from b7aa3.pppool.de (HELO linux) (213.7.122.163)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp010-rz3) with SMTP; 13 Mar 2002 09:36:44 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] lojban application in wearable computing
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:36:38 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <02030723525200.01243@linux> <20020312223652.GU25495@digitalkingdom.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020312223652.GU25495@digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <02031310363802.01246@linux>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20Gohla?= <b.gohla@gmx.de>
Reply-To: b.gohla@gmx.de
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=36703491
X-Yahoo-Profile: badbirdde

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 12 March 2002 23:36, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 11:52:52PM +0100, Bj??rn Gohla wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > today i talked to a computer science student working on his diploma
> > thesis at my university. he is concerned with how to make it easy for
> > users of wearable computers to compose and configure software modules
> > on their devices. we discussed how lojban could help non programmers
> > in telling the gadgets what to do. we will perhaps go into details
> > tomorrow.
> >
> > yes, i am rather excited 8)
>
> Wow, that's very cool, especially as I have been pondering the same
> issues myself in my head (I've been interested in wearables for years).
> Please let me know if I can help.
we need to think up a way to usefully represent lojban parse trees in xml=20
(and thus in scheme). i am wondering about the significance of the sub-rule=
s=20
in the formal grammars, do or do they not need to be represented separately=
?=20
perhaps someone more intimately familiar with the formal grammars can give =
a=20
suggestion here.

before we implement anything it would be useful if jbofi'e could be separat=
ed=20
into a frontend and a backend library, so we would in effect be writing a n=
ew=20
frontend that produces xml instead of the familiar output, but avoid an=20
outright code fork. i am not too familiar with how to make shared libraries=
=20
so that might be something very specific to help with for a start.

as tom nicolai, the computer scientist i am working this on this, is at ceb=
it=20
the next couple of days, the planned web page giving a more detailed=20
description of our plans will not be forth coming until the end of the mont=
h.
- --=20
Bill says: "This is where You go today!"
pub 1024D/834F4976 2001-01-07 Bj=C3=B6rn Gohla (Wissenschaftler, Weltb=C3=
=BCrger)=20
<b.gohla@gmx.de>
Key fingerprint =3D 9FF4 FEDA CCDF DA0E 14D5 8129 6C14 3C39 834F 4976
sub 1024g/29571FE2 2001-01-07
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8jx2sbBQ8OYNPSXYRAvg+AJ0Xjf4Wxqsbe1lZrT/rFxiEUEP5FACcCnPO
SvfDlXlfyESHWh7CaHqPP04=3D
=3DTSJb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

