From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Mar 13 10:09:12 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 13 Mar 2002 18:09:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 42929 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2002 18:09:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m6.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Mar 2002 18:09:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (216.231.54.78) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2002 18:09:12 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16lDCL-0004if-00 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:10:01 -0800 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:10:00 -0800 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] lojban application in wearable computing Message-ID: <20020313181000.GK29405@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: <20020313033144.GH25495@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i From: Robin Lee Powell X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=66827819 X-Yahoo-Profile: robinleepowell On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 01:32:28PM +0000, Robert J. Chassell wrote: > What resemblance do you see between lisp and lojban, exactly? At a > first glance, I see a much stronger resemblance to Prolog. > > I think it is primarily a matter of perception. I do not think of > Prolog as a language for programming hardware. Nor would I want to program hardware with anything as high-level as lojban. I enjoyed the rest of your points, though. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/